SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2242

SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Avinash Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate; For the Petitioners in both the cases.
Ms. Monika Jalota, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Sureshwar Thakur, J. (Oral)

The petitioners herein, in the respective writ petitions, filed separate petitions under Section 11 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (for short 'the PVCL Act'), before the Collector concerned. The said petitions were decided through separate orders, on 14.02.2019, by the Collector concerned. The said order becomes appended as Annexure P-2 in CWP-10420-2023 and Annexure P-6 in CWP-10449-2023, whereins the Collector concerned, passed a disaffirmative order, declaring the Gram Panchayat concerned, respondent herein, as owner of the disputed land.

2. However, the aggrieved from the said separate orders, as became respectively made by the learned Collector concerned, on each of the separate petitions (supra), preferred separate statutory appeals, before the Competent Appellate Authority. The learned Appellate Authority through an order made on 08.07.2022, appended as Annexure P-5 in CWP-10420-2023 and as Annexure P-9 in CWP-10449-2023, rather made a decision, upon appeal No.273 of 2019, as became instituted before it, by one Mahinder Singh. On the above appeal, an order of dismissal was made and the order passed by the le

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top