Raj Rani vs State of Haryana - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 2250

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2250

SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Raj Rani – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Gourav Verma, Advocate with Mr. Aditya Gautam, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana with Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Sureshwar Thakur, J. (Oral)

The writ of certiorari, as asked to be made in the present petition, relates to the quashing of the notification (Annexure P-1), as became issued under Section 4 of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 1894'), thus on 11.11.2002, whereby, the petition lands were brought to acquisition. Moreover, the further claim, as made in the present petition, is for the quashing of the notification (Annexure P-2), as became drawn under Section 6 of the Act of 1894, thus on 07.11.2003.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, in asking for the quashing of the Annexures (supra), makes a vehement espousal before this Court, that since the acquisition proceedings, as became launched under the Act of 1894, did not result, after an award being made by the learned Collector concerned, in pursuance to the Annexures (supra), and, after possession also becoming assumed by the acquiring authority concerned, in the compensation amount becoming tendered before the competent statutory authority or the court concerned, thus for its being made available for becoming disbursed to the landowner(s) concerned. Therefore, he submits, that t