SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2250

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI, JJ.
Raj Rani – Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors. – Respondents
CWP-15679 of 2023
Decided On : 25-07-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Gourav Verma, Advocate with Mr. Aditya Gautam, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana with Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana.

Headnote:(A) Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 4 and 6 - Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Petition for quashing land acquisition notification dated 11.11.2002 and 07.11.2003 - The petitioner contended that since the compensation was not disbursed, the acquisition proceedings should lapse. However, the court found that possession was assumed by the acquiring authority, indicating complete vesting of rights. The court ruled that mere non-payment or non-deposit of compensation does not result in lapse of acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. (Paras 2, 3, 6, 7 and 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to quash notifications concerning the acquisition of their land, arguing that the acquisition proceedings lapsed due to non-payment of compensation. The State contended that compensation had been tendered before the Collector.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the acquisition proceedings did not lapse as possession was duly taken and compensation had been offered. The petition was dismissed for lack of merit.

Issues: Whether the acquisition proceedings lapsed due to non-payment of compensation despite the assumption of possession by the acquiring authority.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that possession taken by the acquiring authority completed the vesting of rights and that the provisions of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act do not apply in cases where possession is taken and compensation is tendered, emphasizing that possession must be physically taken for the lapse to occur.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. details of the land acquisition notifications (Para 1)
2. petitioner's argument regarding compensation non-payment (Para 2)
3. conditions for acquisition proceedings not lapsing (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
4. court's findings on claims and possession issues (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT

Mr. Sureshwar Thakur, J. (Oral)

The writ of certiorari, as asked to be made in the present petition, relates to the quashing of the notification (Annexure P-1), as became issued under Section 4 of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 1894'), thus on 11.11.2002, whereby, the petition lands were brought to acquisition. Moreover, the further claim, as made in the present petition, is for the quashing of the notification (Annexure P-2), as became drawn under Section 6 of the Act of 1894, thus on 07.11.2003.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, in asking for the quashing of the Annexures (supra), makes a vehement espousal before this Court, that since the acquisition proceedings, as became launched under the Act of 1894, did not result, after an award being made by the learned Collector concerned, in pursuance to the Annexures (supra), and, after possession also becoming assumed by the acquiring authority concerned, in the compensation amount becoming tendered before the competent statutory authority or the court concerned, thus for its being made available for becoming disbursed to the landowner(s) concerned. Therefore, he submits, that thereby the provisions of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 2013'), thus become attracted, provisions whereof become extracted hereinafter.

    "24. Land acquisition process under Act No. 1 of 1894 shall be deemed to have lapsed in certain cases.-(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, in any case of land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894,-

    (a) where no award under section 11 of the said Land Acquisition Act has been made, then, all provisions of this Act relating to the determination of compensation shall apply; or

    (b) where an award under said section 11 has been made, then such proceedings shall continue under the provisions of the said Land Acquisition Act, as if the said Act has not been repealed.

    (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), in case of land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (1 of 1894), where an award under the said section 11 has been made five years or more prior to the commencement of this Act but the physical possession of the land has not been taken or the compensation has not been paid the said proceedings shall be deemed to have lapsed and the appropriate Government, if it so chooses, shall initiate the proceedings of such land acquisition afresh in accordance with the provisions of this Act:

    Provided that where an award has been made and compensation in respect of a majority of land holdings has not been deposited in the account of the beneficiaries, then, all beneficiaries specified in the notification for acquisition under section 4 of the said Land Acquisition Act, shall be entitled to compensation in accordance with the provisions of this Act."

3. However, since the learned State counsel has placed on record, a rapat of possession, relating to the petition lands, whereby, on 28.10.2005, the possession of the acquired lands became assumed by the acquiring authority concerned. Therefore, after assumption of possession of the acquired lands by the acquiring authority concerned, thereby there is complete vestment of right, title and interest over the petition lands, in the acquiring authority concerned, and, concomitantly there is complete divestment of any right, title and interest over the petition lands, in the present petitioner.

4. Though in terms of the statutory provisions (supra), one of the twin conditions relating t

                        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                        1
                        2
                        3
                        4
                        5
                        6
                        7
                        8
                        9
                        10
                        11
                        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                        supreme today icon
                        logo-black

                        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                        Please visit our Training & Support
                        Center or Contact Us for assistance

                        qr

                        Scan Me!

                        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                        whatsapp-icon Back to top