IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
LISA GILL, RITU TAGORE, JJ.
Manpreet Kaur – Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors. – Respondents
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 25384 of 2022 (O&M)
Decided On : 02-02-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. adjudication of identical issues (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claims of disqualification based on unauthorized land possession (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. summary of multiple writ petitions and their outcomes (Para 6) |
| 4. court's consideration of disqualification enquiry under section 175 (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. need for a proper enquiry into eligibility (Para 9) |
| 6. direction for expeditious decision on disqualification applications (Para 10 , 11) |
| 7. disposal of writ petitions with no opinion on merits (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
Lisa Gill, J.
All the above-mentioned writ petitions are taken up together for adjudication and decision as they involve an identical issue.
2. Notice of motion was first issued in CWP No.25384 of 2022, thereafter other writ petitions were directed to be heard alongwith CWP No.25384 of 2022. In all the writ petitions prayer is for cancelling the candidature of private respondents therein, who were contesting election for the post of Sarpanch/Panch, on the ground that said candidates are disqualified to contest/hold the post of Sarpanch/Panch in terms of provisions of Section 175 of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').
3. It is pleaded in CWP No.25384 of 2022 that respondents No.5 and 6 are disqualified for contesting elections to the post of Sarpanch in terms of Section 175 (1)(n) of the Act on the ground that they are in unauthorized possession of Gram Panchayat land. It is averred that respondent No.5 is in established unauthorized possession of one House No.68K, which is constructed on land comprised in Killa No.32//6, village Garhi Langri, Tehsil Pehowa, District Kurukshetra and respondent No.6 is in established unauthorized possession of one House No.72A which is also situated on the land in Killa No.32//6 of village Garhi Langri. It is pleaded that Killa No.32//6 is owned by Gram Panchayat of village Garhi Langri. Reference has been made to certain petitions filed by the Gram Panchayat for ejectment of unauthorized occupants of the said land. It is thus pleaded that respondents No.5 and 6 who have filed their nomination papers for contesting election to the post of Sarpanch of village Garhi Langri are disqualified for the same. Petitioner in CWP No.25384 of 2022, who was also a contender for the post of Sarpanch submitted two separate complaints/objections before respondent No.3, the Returning Officer, for cancellation of candidature of respondents No.5 and 6 on the ground of their disqualification under Section 175 (1)(n) as they are alleged to be in unauthorised possession of Gram Panchayat land. Grievance raised in this writ petition is that no action was being taken on the basis of the complaints submitted by the petitioner and that in the given circumstances respondents No.5 and 6 should be restrained from contesting the election in question.
4. Notice of motion was issued in CWP No.25384 of 2022 by a coordinate Bench on 07.11.2022 and election proceedings qua village Garhi Langri were directed to be stayed. However, said interim order was vacated on 11.11.2022 and election to the post of Sarpanch of village Garhi Langri was conducted on 30.11.2022. Ms. Ranjeet Kaur, respondent No.6, has been elected to the post of Sarpanch.
5. Reply by way of Status Report in CWP No.25384 of 2022 has been filed on behalf of respondent No.2 wherein it is affirmed that as per Jamabandi for the year 2020-2021, the land comprised in Khewat 129, Khasra No.32//6, 10 and 11, 24//17/2 is owned by Gram Panchayat, Garhi Langri. As per report of the Revenue Officer (Tehsildar), Pehowa, respondents No.5 and 6 were not personally found to be in illegal possession of the Gram Panchayat land. It has been asserted by learned counsel for the petitioner that it is the father-in- law/husband of the said respondents, who are recorded as the owners of the house in question and the said respondents are very well residing in the same house, therefore, it cannot be said that they are not in illegal possession of
The Deputy Commissioner had the authority to order the removal of the petitioner under Section 51(3)(b) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, as the petitioner did not possess the minimum qualific....
The legal principle indicates that disqualification for illegal occupation of land applies solely to the individual committing the act, not to family members.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the legislative object of preventing encroachment on government land or public property, as enshrined in the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 19....
The judgment established the legal principle that unauthorized occupation of land belonging to the Grampanchyat constitutes encroachment, leading to disqualification under the Maharashtra Village Pan....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.