Back
MANISHA BATRA
Baljidner Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gurjit Kaur – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mrs. Manisha Batra, J.
The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner impugning the order dated 10.10.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Mansa in case bearing No.CRM/553/2022, whereby conditional warrants of arrest were ordered to be issued against him.
2. Brief facts of the case relevant for the disposal of this petition are that the respondents had filed a petition bearing No. MNT/112/2018 titled as Gurjit Kaur and others v. Baljinder Singh under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. against the present petitioner on the grounds that respondent No.1 was married with the petitioner on 27.01.2002. Two children i.e. respondents No. 2 and 3, were born out of the wedlock. The petitioner had fallen in bad company. He was a greedy person. The respondent No. 1 was subjected to harassment and cruelty by him on account of bringing insufficient dowry at the time of marriage and on account of demand of dowry raised by them, ultimately, she was turned out of her matrimonial house along with minor respondents. While alleging that the petitioner was running a shop of selling mobile phones and owned other properties and was earning a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- from all sourc
Interim maintenance orders merge into final orders but do not nullify interim relief, reaffirming the principle established in Puneet Chopra case.
Non-compliance with maintenance orders can lead to the issuance of warrants for levying the amount, as provided under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
An order granting interim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC is an interlocutory order and not revisable.
Interim maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. requires thorough financial assessment of both parties, with specific affidavits of assets and liabilities being crucial for the determination of ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of the husband to provide maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. to prevent destitution and support the wife and children.
An order of interim maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. is an intermediate order and thus revisable under Section 397(1); it was affirmed by the Court as not suffering from illegality.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of considering the affidavit of assets and liabilities in determining the quantum of interim maintenance allowance and the need for ....
Multiplicity of litigation, especially when an impugned order is alleged to be in violation of an interim order, is not warranted.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
