IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
N.S. SHEKHAWAT, J.
Anupam Singla – Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
CRM-M-3712 of 2024
Decided On : 19-03-2024
JUDGMENT
Mr. N.S.Shekhawat J. - (Oral)
The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. with a prayer to grant regular bail to him in case FIR No.04 dated 06.01.2019 registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC and Sections 132(1)B and C of GST Act, 2017, at Police Station Arya Nagar, District Rohtak.
2. The FIR in the present case was registered on the basis of the complaint received from Excise Taxation Officer-cum-Proper Officer of State Tax, Rohtak and the same has been reproduced below:-
"From R.K. Gupta, Excise Taxation Officer-cum- Proper Officer of State Tax, Rohtak To, S.H.O. Arya Nagar, Rohtak No. SPL-1/R.K. Gupta ETO/Rohtak /dt: 06.01.2019 Subject: Lodging of FIR against Sh. Vinod S/o Sh. Kishan Lal R/o Jatuwas Bithwana, Rewari-123401 Proprietor of M/s Vishal Industries GSTIN 06BLVPV3156M1Z5, J.P. Colony, Near Rambir Truck Body, Rohtak Mobile No. 08295870505, 9729100134 PAN: BLVPV3156M Aadhar: 594676176798Bank Detail: Saving Account Number 679010110005420, IFSC BKID0006790, Bank of India, Shop No. 182, New Anaj Mandi, Rewari Ref: Excise Taxation Commissioner Haryana office letter No. SPL-2/AETC (Enf.) dt. 05.01.2019 regarding direction to lodge FIR in case of bogus/fake firms Memo: On the basis of information received from office of Excise Taxation Commissioner Haryana, Panchkula, from office of DETC (ST) Fatehabad and The Tribune Chandigarh cutting dt. 25th December, 2018 regarding involvement of M/s Vishal Industries, GSTIN 06BLVPV3156M1Z5, Distt.Rohtak in issuing fake invoices for the purpose of hoodwinking the government through bogus Input Tax Credit without actual receipt and supply of goods, the undersigned conducted investigation in the case. During investigation, it is found that the proprietor Sh. Vinod S/o Sh. Kishan Lal proprietor of M/s Vishal Industries GSTIN 06BLVPV3156M1Z5, Mobile No. 08295870505, 9729100134 has been found to be involved in evasion of taxes. During physical survey, it is found that the said firm is non-existing and non functional at the address J.P. Colony, Near Rambir Truck Body, Rohtak and has been found engaged in showing purchases in Returns from non-existent and non-functional GST dealers within the State of Haryana and outside the State of Haryana without supplies of goods and further issuing fake tax invoices to the non-existent and non-functional dealers. Sh. Vinod S/o Sh. Kishan Lal fraudulently obtained registration under the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 with the intention to evade tax. During the financial year 2018-19, the dealer has conducted sale of Rs. 201442903 (Rs. 20.14 Crores). This fraudulent act of the above said dealer of claiming and utilization of fake Input Tax Credit (ITC) in disposal of output tax liabilities without actual payment of tax has resulted into loss of revenue to the State as under: Tax IGST Rs. 96, 46, 041-00 CGST Rs. 2, 93, 864-00 SGST Rs. 2, 93, 864-00 Total tax Rs. 10, 233, 769-00 In view of the above, it is, therefore, requested to lodge FIR against Sh. Vinod S/o Sh. Kishan Lal proprietor of M/s Vishal Industries GSTIN 06BLVPV3156M1Z5 Rohtak SD R.K. Gupta, Excise Taxation Officer-cum- Proper Officer of State Tax, Rohtak M.NO- 9896110300. Today at the Police station- According to the contents of the above application received, offence under section 420/406/467/468/471 IPC, 132(1) B C of GST Act 2017 is made out, therefore an FIR No. 04, Dt 06-01-2019, Under section 420/406/467/468/471 IPC, 132(1) B C of GST Act 2017, P.S Arya Nagar Rohtak has been registered. The copies of the FIR are prepared and the special reports are being sent to Illaqa Magistrate, Rohtak, Superintendent of Police, Rohtak and Deputy Superintendent, Rohtak through emails. The original copy of the application is kept with the police file. Further investigation of the case will be conducted. The above case has been registered with the code of SHO SI Jaibhagwan No. 670 in his presence in GDR. Sir, section 132(1) B C of GST
AI
The pendency of multiple FIRs against an accused does not justify the denial of bail if no incriminating evidence is presented.
The court ruled that continued custody of the petitioner was unnecessary given the nature of the evidence and the duration of detention, allowing for bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.
Accused granted bail due to prolonged custody, lack of evidence, and the trial's lengthy nature, emphasizing the maintainability of the FIR will be adjudicated in trial.
The court granted bail based on the duration of custody and the status of co-accused, emphasizing that trial may take a long time.
The court granted bail based on the petitioner's lengthy incarceration and the slow progress of the trial, emphasizing that the decision does not affect the merits of the case.
The court established that personal liberty must be protected and that the gravity of the offence alone cannot justify denial of bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.