SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 917

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NAMIT KUMAR, J.
Ram Lubhaya – Petitioner
Versus
Punjab State Power Corp. Ltd. & Ors. – Respondents
CWP NO. 18249 of 2017
Decided On : 28-02-2024

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. K.L. Arora, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Ms. Promila Nain, Advocate; For the Respondents

Government employees are entitled to interest on delayed retirement benefits when payments are unjustifiably withheld, as established by precedent.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 226/227 - Writ petition for mandamus seeking directions for grant of interest on delayed payments of retrial benefits - Petitioner retired on 30.04.2010, with promotional scales due on 01.04.2005 and 01.04.2008 - Delay in payment of gratuity, pension, and promotional scales justified by service deficiencies - Court held petitioner entitled to interest from 20.09.2013 till actual payment. (Paras 9, 10, 11, 12)

(B) Interest on Delayed Payments - Employee entitled to interest for inordinate delay in releasing benefits without justification - Relevant case law cited includes A.S. Randhawa v. State of Punjab and J.S. Cheema v. State of Haryana. (Paras 10, 11)

JUDGMENT

Namit Kumar, J. (Oral)

The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus for issuance of directions to the respondents to grant 18% interest on the delayed payments of retrial benefits such as gratuity, arrears of pension and arrears on account of release of time bound promotional scales after 09 years and 16 years of service.

2. Brief facts of the case, as have been pleaded in the petition, are that the petitioner joined the service of the respondents as Store Munshi on work charge basis on 01.03.1977 and thereafter as regular Telephonist from 05.08.1978. He was promoted to the post of Upper Division Clerk in 1987 and thereafter, as Revenue Accountant on 02.04.1991 and retired as such on 30.04.2010, on attaining the age of superannuation of 58 years.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that pursuance to the financial circular dated 23.04.1990, the petitioner was entitled for grant of time bound promotional scales on completion of 09 years and 16 years of service w.e.f. 01.04.2000 and 01.04.2007, respectively. He submitted application/option dated 11.05.2001 for the release of 09 years promotional scale and thereafter, on 15.10.2008 he submitted another application/option for the release of 16 years time bound promotional scale, however, despite submitting various representations including representation dated 30.06.2014, the said benefits were not granted to him which compelled him to approach this Court by filing CWP No.25651 of 2014, which was disposed of vide order dated 16.12.2014 with a direction to decide the representation of the petitioner by passing a speaking order, within a period of 03 months and in pursuance thereto, vide order dated 16.04.2015 (Annexure P-3), the petitioner was granted the 09 year time bound promotional scale w.e.f. 01.04.2005 and 16 years time bound promotional scale w.e.f. 01.04.2008. It has further been submitted that the retrial dues of the petitioner were released after a considerable delay and the details of the payments received by the petitioner are as under :-

Sr. No.

Item

Amount due

Date of Retirement

Due date of payment

Payment made by respondents on

Delayed period of interest

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1.

Gratuity

73,508/-

30.04.2010

01.05.2010

07.01.2016

5 years 8 months

2.

Arrears on account of release of Time Bound Promotional Scales after 9 years and 16 years of service

1,44,496/-

30.04.2010

01.04.2005 for 9 years Promotional Scale

21.07.2015

10 years 3 months and 20 days

 

30.04.2010

01.04.2008 for 16 years Promotional Scale

21.07.2015

7 years 3 months and 20 days

3.

Arrears of pension on release of promotional scale of 9 years and 16 years of service

1,70,100/-

30.04.2010

01.05.2010

01.03.2016

5 years 10 months

Since the payment of gratuity, arrears of pension and arrears on account of time bound promotional scales have been released to the petitioner after a considerable delay, therefore, he is entitled for the grant of interest.

4. Reply on behalf of the respondents has been filed, wherein it has been stated as under :-

"5. That the content of Para No.5 are matter of record as per as the sanction of 9 years time bound and 16 years time bound promotional scales are concerned. However, the petitioner was not given the scale due to the pendency of chargesheets/show cause notices as same were not decided :

(Charge Sheet/Show Cause Notice)

Office Order vide which the same were decided

List of Imputation/Show Cause Notices and decisions

SCN No.174/17.05.2011

686/20-09-2013

Recovery of amount equivalent to one year promotion.

SCN No.C-361/12.11.2009

446/21-06-2011

5% deduction in the pension for one year.

CS No.909/18.12.2009

645/07-04-2011

5% deduction in the pension for six months.

SCN No.848/26.08.2008

430/01-03-2011

5% deduction in the pension for Six months.

CS

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top