SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1133

SUKHVINDER KAUR
Ranbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gurdev Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. K.K. Garg, Advocate; For the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Sukhvinder Kaur, J.

The instant Regular Second Appeal has been filed against the concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below.

2. Brief facts as per plaint are that Chhano Devi, mother of the parties to the suit, was recorded as owner of land measuring 8 Kanals being 32/437th share out of land measuring 109 Kanals-03 Marlas, comprised in Khewat No.16/16 Kittas 17, situated within the revenue estate of village Sarsa, Tehsil Pehowa, District Kurukshetra, vide Jamabandi for the year 2004-2005 and Brij Lal, father of the parties, was owner of land/bara measuring 10 Marlas being 10/13th share out of total land 13 Marlas comprised in Khewat No.17//17, Khatoni No.31, Khasra No.359(0-13), situated within the revenue estate of village Sarsa, Tehsil Pehowa, vide Jamabandi for the year 2004-2005. Above said Chhano Devi and Brij Lal died on 05.09.1999 and 11.02.1997 respectively and parties to the suit being brother and sisters are their legal representatives. However, in the death certificate, name of Brij Lal was wrongly recorded as Birju Devi. Both Chhano Devi and Brij Lal during their lifetime had bequeathed all their movable and immovable properties including suit land in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top