SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 1765

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Paramjeet Singh
Baljit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Ajaib Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Tribhawan Singla, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Paramjeet Singh, J. (Oral)

The suit out of which this regular second appeal arises was filed by appellants for declaration that they are owners of suit land in equal shares, fully detailed in head note of plaint, on the basis of registered Will dated 18.03.1985 executed by Chanan Singh in favour of the plaintiffs and for setting aside mutation no.4017 in respect of inheritance of Chanan Singh, having been sanctioned on false and forged Will dated 07.04.1998.

2. The Court of first instance dismissed the suit vide judgment and decree dated 19.11.2009. Feeling aggrieved, the plaintiffs preferred an appeal which has been dismissed by lower Appellate Court, vide judgment and decree dated 24.12.2011, whereby findings of trial Court on issues no.1 to 6 have been upheld, however, findings on issue no.7 have been set aside and Will dated 07.04.1998 propounded by respondents no.1 to 3 has been declared as illegal, null and void.

3. The detailed facts are already recapitulated in the judgments of the courts below and are not required to be reproduced. However, the brief facts relevant for disposal of this regular second appeal are that Chanan Singh son of Hira Singh was owner of land mea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top