Back
SUKHVINDER KAUR
Karamjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Amandeep Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the accident and claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's analysis on the evidence and testimonies. (Para 11 , 14 , 15 , 17) |
| 3. arguments regarding negligence and causation. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 4. determination of compensation and liability. (Para 21 , 22 , 24) |
| 5. final conclusion on compensation awarded. (Para 26) |
JUDGMENT
Sukhvinder Kaur, J.
This order shall dispose of FAO-4283-2017 ( Karamjit Singh v. Amandeep Singh and another) and FAO-6229-2017 ( Amandeep Singh v. Karamjit Singh and another) as both the appeals have arisen from a common award dated 11.01.2017.
2. This appeal (FAO-4283-2017) has been filed by the appellant-claimant for modification of award dated 11.01.2017 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rupnagar, whereby the claim petition filed by the appellant-claimant invoking the provisions of Section 166 /140 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 (for short, "the Act of 1988") was partly allowed and he was awarded a compensation of Rs.6,84,582/- and exonerating respondent No.2-Insurance Company to pay the compensation amount, respondent No.1 (driver-owner) of offending vehicle was directed to pay the amount of compensation positi
The court established that compensation for permanent disability must account for loss of future earnings and amenities, emphasizing the need for just compensation reflecting the claimant's suffering....
The court affirmed that the Insurance Company is liable for compensation despite the absence of a driving license for the driver, emphasizing the need for sufficient evidence to support claims agains....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
