SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2964

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUKHVINDER KAUR, J.
IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company Ltd. – Petitioner
Versus
Ram Singh & Ors. – Respondents
FAO-2387 of 2018
Decided On : 29-05-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate; For the Appellant(in FAO-2387-2018)/for Respondent No.3 (in FAO-2496-2018).
Mr. Jaideep Verma, Advocate; For the Appellant(in FAO-2496-2018)/for Respondents No.1 and 2(in FAO-2387-2018).

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 166 - Motor accident claims - Appeals addressing the award for compensation due to the death of Rajwinder Singh - Claimants awarded Rs.15,27,000/- with interest of 9% per annum - Appeals filed for setting aside the award and for enhancement of compensation - The accident occurred due to rash driving by the offending vehicle. (Paras 2, 3, 8, 10)

(B) Liability - The driver and owner of the offending vehicle, along with the insurance company, were jointly and severally liable for compensation. Compensation for loss of dependency calculated based on annual income and future prospects, while considering that the deceased was unmarried and hence, a deduction for personal expenses was made. (Paras 10, 17, 19, 30)

Facts of the case:
The claimants filed a petition under Section 166 of the MV Act after Rajwinder Singh was involved in a fatal accident on 12.04.2016, where he sustained grievous injuries from a collision with an over-speeding vehicle. (Paras 3, 4)

Findings of Court:
The award of Rs.15,27,000/- was deemed justified, and the court later recalculated compensation, rounding it to Rs.15,42,000/-, including future prospects and conventional damages. (Paras 19, 20)

Issues: Determining negligence, assessing correct compensation, verifying the reliability of witnesses, and the relevance of FIR details. (Paras 21, 25, 30)

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed the compensation calculation method, ruling that the Tribunal's assessment of income and the application of the multiplier principle were appropriate, as the evidence collectively pointed to the driver's liability. (Paras 17, 30)

Result: Appeal dismissed, with reaffirmed compensation awarded to claimants. (Paras 30, 31)

Table of Content
1. overview of appeals related to compensation claim (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of the accident and loss claimed (Para 3 , 4)
3. respondents' objections to claim (Para 5 , 6)
4. arguments for claimants and insurer’s counter-arguments (Para 11 , 12)
5. evidence regarding deceased’s employment and income (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
6. assessment of income and dependency for compensation calculation (Para 16 , 17)
7. justification for the compensation amount awarded (Para 18 , 19)
8. final decision on appeal and compensation order (Para 20 , 31)
9. insurance company's claim of collusion and its implications (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
10. law on evidence and witness reliability (Para 24 , 25)
11. civil vs. criminal proceedings in determining liability (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
12. court's validation of evidence against the insurance company's claims (Para 29 , 30)

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Sukhvinder Kaur, J.

This order shall dispose of FAO-2387-2018 (IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Ram Singh and others) and FAO- 2496-2018 (Ram Singh and another v. Surjeet Singh and others) as both the appeals have arisen from a common award dated 13.12.2017.

2. Appeal (FAO-2387-2018) has been filed by the appellant- Insurance Company for setting aside the award dated 13.12.2017 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rupnagar, whereby the claim petition filed by the claimants was partly allowed and they were awarded a compensation of Rs.15,27,000/- along with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of realization on account of death of Rajwinder Singh in MACT Case No.336 of 2016 in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 12.04.2016. Appeal (FAO-2496-2018) has been filed by appellants-claimants seeking enhancement of compensation.

3. The relevant facts are that the appellants-claimants filed claim petitions invoking the provisions of Section 166 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 (for short, "the Act of 1988") claiming compensation with the averments that on 12.04.2016, Rajwinder Singh (since deceased) was coming from Jhajji Chowk side to his village Agampur on his motorcycle bearing registration No.PB12-U-8641. Rajwinder Singh was driving the motorcycle at a slow speed, on his left hand side. At about 8.00 P.M., when he reached near the turn of Crushers, in the area of village Agampur on Garshankar main road, then a Maruti Dzire Car bearing registration No.PB- 12-V-5021, being driven by respondent No.2 (driver) in a rash and negligent manner and at a very high speed, came from the back side and hit the above said motorcycle. Due to the collision, appellant-claimant sustained multiple grievous head injuries, compound fractures on his body and he died on 12.04.2016, on the way to PGI, Chandigarh. On the statement of Prithvi Singh, FIR No.40, dated 13.04.2016, under Sections 279 , 304-A and 427 IPC was registered at Police Station, Anandpur Sahib against the said driver.

4. It has been averred in the claim petition that Rajwinder Singh (since deceased) was the only child of the claimants. He was 22 years old and was a student of B.Tech, final year (Civil Engineering) at Global College, Khuhi and was under training with M/s Vishesh Kumar Contractor and was drawing Rs.8,000/- as a stipend. His placement took place in the same company on annual package of Rs.3,60,000/- P.A. He was having a bright future and had also applied for government job for Junior Engineer and was likely to earn handsome salary. The claimants being old aged remained ill and deceased was the only hope of the claimants. Due to sudden demise of their only son, they have suffered irreparable loss and they have been deprived of love, affection, care, help, comfort and society of deceased. Claimants have spent more than Rs.2,00,000/- on transportation and last rites of deceased. It has been prayed that compensation of Rs.80,00,000/- be given qua death of Rajwinder Singh.

5. The driver-Sukhwinder Kumar, owner-Surjeet Singh as well as insurer-IFFCO TOKIO

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top