TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, SANJIV BERRY
Fermina Developers Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J.
Challenge in the instant petition is to the recall notice dated 10.11.2022 (Annexure P-7) issued by the respondent-Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited whereby a Repayment Structure/OTS letter dated 01.09.2021 (Annexure P-2) stands terminated. Further challenge is to the notice dated 19.12.2022 issued under Section 13 (2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter to be referred to as the 2002 Act). A writ of mandamus is also sought directing the respondent to adhere to the repayment structure/OTS letter dated 01.09.2021 (Annexure P-2) and not to adopt any coercive steps against the petitioners.
2. We may take note that identical issue/prayer came to be raised in terms of filing CWP No.575-2023 (M/s Vatika One India Next Pvt.Ltd. and another v. Indiabulls Commercial Credit Ltd.). Such petition was at the hands of a group company and also assailed the termination of the repayment structure/OTS letter dated 01.09.2021 issued by Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited. Such petition came up for preliminary hearing before this Court on 18.01.2023 and while issuing notice for 23.02
Amrik Singh v. DCB Bank Limited (2022) 2 RCR(Civ) 791
Devi Ispat Limited v. State Bank of India (2014) 5 SCC 762
Federal Bank v. Sagar Thomas (2003) 10 SCC 733
A writ petition is maintainable against a scheduled bank under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as the bank is performing public functions and is governed by the provisions of the Banking Re....
(1) Writ petitions filed against proposed action under Section 13(4) of SARFAESI Act is not maintainable and/or entertainable at all.(2) Recovery of debt – High Court should have been extremely caref....
The availability of alternative remedies under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Act, 2002 renders a writ petition not maintainable, especially aga....
The High Court must not entertain writ petitions regarding SARFAESI actions without the petitioner first pursuing statutory remedies before the Debts Recovery Tribunal as mandated under the SARFAESI ....
Writ petitions against private financial institutions under the SARFAESI Act are not maintainable; statutory remedies must be pursued instead.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.