SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Guljar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of promotion denial and associated malice. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. claims to promotion ignored; prior court decisions referenced. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. application of principles of natural justice and administrative justice. (Para 10 , 18 , 29) |
| 4. reasoning related to bias and integrity issues. (Para 12 , 15 , 28) |
| 5. court's orders quashing prior decisions and granting promotion. (Para 32 , 34) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J.
This Writ Petition is preferred by the petitioner praying for issuance of directions to the respondents to consider and promote the petitioner on the post of Technical Advisor (Auto) w.e.f. 01.01.1992 when the post fell vacant on account of the refusal for promotion of his immediate senior. Further the petitioner prays for quashing of the adverse remarks entered in the ACR; and order whereby his representation was rejected. Further he prays for quashing of the punishment order dt.26.06.1996 (Annexure P-21) whereby he has been awarded the punishment of censure; and also the order dt.13.11.1999 whereby his Appeal regarding entry of adverse remarks was rejected.
2. The brief facts, as stated by the petitioner, are that the post of Motor Mecha
Punjab National Bank v. Kunj Bihari Misra
Ramesh Chandra v. Delhi University
Regina v. Gaming Board for Great Britain ex p. Benaim and Khaida
S. Parthasarathi v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Smt. S.R. Venkataraman v. Union of India
Disciplinary actions must be supported by clear reasoning; failure to provide reasons renders such actions invalid.
The dismissal of a judicial officer was quashed due to violation of natural justice and lack of proper inquiry into adverse remarks in ACRs.
The court affirmed the principle that judicial review of administrative actions in disciplinary processes is limited to procedural correctness, not evidential review, and mandated reconsideration of ....
The adverse entry awarded to the petitioner was quashed as it was found to be illegal and not based on tangible material. The decision of the Administrative Committee was also quashed. The court dire....
Adverse remarks in ACR must be substantiated and judicial review allows reconsideration of promotional claims without directing specific outcomes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.