IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANJAY VASHISTH, J.
Dr. Mohanmeet Khosla – Petitioner
Versus
Panjab University, Chandigarh & Ors. – Respondents
CWP-30348 of 2019 (O&M)
Decided On : 25-06-2024
JUDGMENT
Sanjay Vashisth, J.
Present writ petition has been filed by Prof. (Dr.) Mohanmeet Khosla, for quashing of the order dated 20.09.2019 (Annexure P-4), vide which Ms. Sumedha Singh (respondent No. 3), Assistant Professor, has been designated as "Chairman/Head of the School of Communication Studies", Sector 14, Chandigarh, for three years w.e.f. 2019, by respondent Nos. 1 and 2, i.e. Panjab University, Chandigarh.
2. Petitioner has pleaded that designation of respondent No. 3 as 'Chairperson/Head of the School of Communication Studies', is in contravention with Rules 2.1, 2.3 and 2.4 of Chapter - LII of the Panjab University Calendar, Volume III.
3. Further pleaded and prayed that a direction be issued to designate/appoint the petitioner as 'Chairperson/Head of the School of Communication Studies', for the stipulated period of three years.
4. Order dated 20.09.2019 (Annexure P-4), which was sought to be quashed, at the first instance, while filing the present writ petition, is reproduced here under:-
" Panjab University (Chandigarh)
No. 8535-45/E517
Date 20/09/2019
Office Order
Sd /-
Deputy Registrar (Estt.)"
5. However, during the pendency of the writ petition, respondent No. 3 - Ms. Sumedha Singh, Assistant Professor, had completed her fixed term of three years as 'Chairperson/Head of the School of Communication Studies', which resulted into the passing of another order, bearing No. 6470-83/Estt.-I, dated 07.09.2022 (Annexure P-12), vide which Ms. Bhavneet Bhatti (respondent No. 4), Assistant Professor, has been designated as 'Chairperson/Head of the School of Communication Studies', for three years w.e.f. 01.10.2022, by respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
6. Order dated 07.09.2022 (Annexure P-12), has been placed on record subsequently by the petitioner, alongwith Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 7007 of 2023, under Order I Rule 10 read with section 151 CPC, vide which impleadment of Ms. Bhavneet Bhatti, Assistant Professor, as respondent No. 4 in the present proceedings, was sought. The said application was allowed vide order dated 18.10.2023, passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, and Ms. Bhavneet Bhatti, Assistant Professor, was arrayed as respondent No. 4 in CWP No. 30348 of 2019.
For ready reference, order dated 07.09.2022 (Annexure P-12), vide which Ms. Bhavneet Bhatti (respondent No. 4), Assistant Professor, has been designated as 'Chairperson/Head of the School of Communication Studies', is also reproduced here under:-
"Panjab University (Chandigarh)
No. 6470-83/Estt.-I
Dated 7/9/2022
Office Orders
Sd/- 7/9/2022
Assistant Registrar (Estt. - I)"
7. Before proceeding for examining the facts and relevant sta
The court affirmed that the rotation of headship in university departments must be strictly followed, prohibiting any individual from serving a second term until all eligible candidates have been des....
The Chancellor's authority allows for resolving seniority disputes in academia, despite procedural lapses, with seniority determined primarily by age.
The appointment process must adhere to statutory provisions based on seniority, and temporary appointments cannot undermine established legal frameworks.
The Executive Council exceeded its authority by unilaterally imposing new qualifications on Heads of Departments, which contradicted the established statutory framework under the University Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of seniority and fair consideration based on seniority in the appointment process, as interpreted under Statute 18 of the University....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the respondent authorities to follow the regular appointment process as mandated by the Assam Secondary Education (Provincialis....
Seniority in academic appointments must be determined by continuous service length under applicable statutes, rather than solely on the date of eligibility for promotion.
HoD appointment requires rotational basis among eligible faculty, strict adherence to due process, hearings, and three-year tenure limit under Section 46.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.