SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3093

RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Rakesh Prashar – Appellant
Versus
Usha Prashar (Since Deceased) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rajeev Anand, Advocate, and Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate; For the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Rajbir Sehrawat, J. (Oral)

This regular second appeal has been filed by the defendants of the original suit; challenging the concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the Trial Court and the lower Appellate Court, whereby the suit filed by the respondents/plaintiffs for declaration qua the Will dated 13.09.1994 as illegal; has been decreed; and the said Will has been held to be invalid.

2. Notice of motion.

3. On the asking of the Court, Ms. Aarushi Garg, assisting counsel of Mr. R.S.Bains, Senior Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 and Ms. Malika Sobti, Advocate appearing for Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.5.

4. Respective counsels have agreed to address the arguments for final disposal of the appeal. The parties are being referred to as they were described in the original suit.

5. The brief facts, as involved in the present appeal, are that the plaintiffs/respondents filed a suit challenging the Will dated 04.10.1994; allegedly executed by their father in favour of the appellants/defendants No.1 and 2, besides challenging the consequent mutation entered by the Estate Office, Chandigarh, as illegal. It was ass

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top