SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3110

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJBIR SEHRAWAT, J.
Dr. Sonia Verma & Anr. – Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana & Anr. – Respondents
CRM-M-34512 of 2023
Decided On : 19-07-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Keshav pratap Singh, Advocate; For the Petitioners

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 420, 467, 506, 34, 120B - Quashing of FIR - Petition to quash FIR for offences related to fraudulent activities regarding land - Court finds that allegations in FIR establish necessary ingredients for the offences alleged and concludes there are no grounds for quashing - The court emphasizes that no opinion on the merits of the case is expressed for any further proceedings. (Paras 1-3)

(B) Quashing of FIR - The power under Section 482 to quash FIR is to be exercised cautiously and in cases where it is evident that no offence is made out from the allegations. (Para 2)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenge FIR No.375 for offences under various sections of IPC related to a land dispute involving Killa No.8 in Rectangle No.33, which the petitioner has not purchased.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the FIR, stating the allegations within set the necessary foundation for the case, and there are no sufficient grounds presented to warrant quashing.

Issues: The primary issue is whether the ingredients of the alleged offences are made out in the FIR.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the allegations in the FIR establish the necessary elements of the offences charged, and any decision to quash the FIR is unwarranted without a lack of substance in the claims.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. quashing of fir based on factual allegations. (Para 1)
2. court finds no grounds to quash fir. (Para 2)
3. order dismissed without opinion on merits. (Para 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT

Rajbir Sehrawat, J. (Oral)

The present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing of FIR No.375 dated 31.10.2022 registered under Sections 420 , 467, 506, 34 and 120B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (for short 'the IPC') ( Section 467 IPC added later on) at Police Station Kasola, District Rewari.

2. A perusal of the allegations in the FIR show that the entire aspect relates to Killa No.8 in Rectangle No.33. It is not even in dispute that the petitioner had not purchased Killa No.8 in Rectangle No.33. Therefore, on the face of it, it cannot be said that the ingredients of the orders are not, per se, made out. Therefore, this Court does not find any ground to quash the aforesaid FIR as such.

3. Dismissed.

4. However, nothing said herein shall be taken as an expression of opinion on merits of the case in any other proceedings.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top