SURESHWAR THAKUR, SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Jaswinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sureshwar Thakur, J.
1. In the instant petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the impugned notification dated 27.2.2024 (Annexure P-8), and, the impugned order dated 28.2.2024 (Annexure P-2) passed by the respondents concerned, wherebys the Gram Panchayats, whose term of five years is completed, have been ordered to be dissolved from the date of their first meeting in terms of Article 243-E of the Constitution of India and Section 15 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (for short ‘the Act of 1994’), and, Administrators have been appointed for the Gram Panchayats. The petitioner has also sought the quashing of the impugned order dated 21.5.2024 (Annexure P-13) passed by the respondent concerned, wherebys the representation of the petitioner has not been considered.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits, that the time of election for the post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat of village Bhamme Kalan, District Mansa, petitioner Jaswinder Kaur and her opponent namely Jasbir Kaur had submitted their nomination papers for the post of Sarpanch of the village concerned, however their nomination papers were rejected, and, the post of Sarpanch of village (supra) remain
The term of a Gram Panchayat is strictly five years from its first meeting, and bye-elections do not extend this duration.
Elected Sarpanches/Panches have no right to continue in office after their term ends, solely because new elections have not been held, in the absence of a provision in the Act or Rules conferring suc....
Point of law : intention of the Legislature that the effect of expression "the elected member of the Grama Panchayat cease to be member" as used in Section 8(3) is to state that for the purpose of ex....
The appointment/continuance of the existing elected body as Administrator after the expiration of their term would be contrary to the mandate of Article 243E of the Constitution and the Maharashtra V....
Immunity against No Confidence Motion is calculated from the date of election of the first Sarpanch, not subsequent elections, ensuring stability in the democratic process.
The constitutional scheme and the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 and the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 were harmoniously interpreted to conclude that the Gram Panchayat had c....
The Deputy Commissioner had the authority to order the removal of the petitioner under Section 51(3)(b) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, as the petitioner did not possess the minimum qualific....
The Court clarified the applicability of section 87 and section 40 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 in the context of the dissolution of the Panchayat and the remo....
The tenure of elected municipal councillors is strictly five years as per constitutional mandate, with no provisions for extensions despite interruptions caused by administration appointments.
The amendments to the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, reducing the term of office for Adhyaksha to 30 months and the prohibition period for a no-confidence motion to 15 months were....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.