Back
N. S. SHEKHAWAT
X (7673) – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. right to privacy includes the right to be forgotten. (Para 1) |
| 2. right to privacy and employment impacts. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. right to be forgotten as an aspect of privacy. (Para 3) |
| 4. acknowledgement of lack of serious objection. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. consequences of quashed fir affirmed. (Para 7) |
| 6. directions for masking petitioner’s name. (Para 8) |
| 7. the petition is allowed. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT :
Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, J.
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 528 of BNSS with a prayer to issue directions to the Registry/Computer Branch of this Court as well as District Court Gurugram to redact the name of the petitioner from the e-courts portal, in connection with FIR No. 100 dated 10.04.2024 under Sections 384 /419 of IPC and Sections 66 -C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2008 (amended) registered at Police Station Cyber Cell West, Gurugram.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is a reputed corporate professional and had been working at the highest levels in Amazon, American Express and HSBC and is having total experience spanning over 20 years in India and USA. The petitioner is a post graduate of reputed educational
The right to privacy includes the right to be forgotten, allowing individuals acquitted of charges to remove their names from public records and mitigate the impacts of past allegations on their futu....
The judgment emphasizes the obligation of courts to maintain judgments as per applicable rules and regulations, the limitations on the right to be forgotten, and the public interest in maintaining in....
Judgments forming part of Court records are public documents as referable under Section 74 of Indian Evidence Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to balance the freedom of speech and expression with the right to privacy and reputation, emphasizing that the right to privacy, reputatio....
The court recognized the right to privacy and the right to be forgotten, emphasizing accountability in law enforcement and awarding compensation for wrongful detention.
Court ought not to pass any sort of order which may restrict power of police in maintaining law and order of State, except for protecting basic right of a citizen.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
