SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 18

NIDHI GUPTA
Jasbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Balbir Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Vikas Singh Adv., Ms. Anamika Shoeran Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Ms. Nidhi Gupta, J.

1. The plaintiffs are in second appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned Courts below, whereby the suit of the appellants/plaintiffs for declaration to the effect that plaintiffs and performa defendants/respondents No. 4 to 12 herein, are owners in possession and successors to the estate of Sohail Singh @ Rawel Singh on the basis of his Will dated 18.12.1982, has been dismissed by both the Courts below.

2. The parties shall hereinafter be referred to as per their status before the learned trial Court i.e. the appellants are the ‘plaintiffs’; and the respondents are the ‘defendants’.

3. The plaintiffs have filed the present suit for declaration that plaintiffs along with proforma defendant no.4 Pritam Kaur are owners in possession and have succeeded the estate of Sohail Singh at Village Manakpur and Urna as per Will dated 18.12.1982; and suit for declaration that whole estate of Rawail Singh @ Sohail Singh is succeeded by plaintiffs & proforma defendant Pritam Kaur and defendants no.1 to 3 have no concern with the same; and suit for declaration that revenue record showing defendants no.1 to 3 as successor to the extent of 1/3 shar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top