SUMEET GOEL
Bikramjit Singh @ Vicky @ World – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual context of the fir and accused (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding bail and trial delay (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. judicial review of trial progress and implications (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. order regarding bail based on trial delay (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. final decision and conditions for bail. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT :
Mr. Sumeet Goel, J.
1. The instant petition is the third petition under Section 483 of BNSS , 2023 for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.175 dated 27.09.2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 21 , 22, 29 of the NDPS Act and Section 25 of the ARMS ACT (offence under Sections 25 of NDPS Act and Sections 420 , 465, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC and Section 12 of the PASSPORT ACT , 1920 added later on) at Police Station Sadar Kapurthala, District Kapurthala.
2. The case set up in the FIR in question (as set out in the present petition by the petitioner) is as follows:-
Hussainara Khatoon vs. Home Secy.
Abdul Rehman Antulay vs R.S. Nayak reported as (1992) 1 SCC 225
Mohd Muslim @ Hussain vs. State (NCT of Delhi) reported as 2023 INSC 311
The right to a speedy trial is fundamental, and prolonged incarceration without justifiable cause infringes on the accused's rights, warranting bail under stringent provision scrutiny.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.