Back
HARKESH MANUJA
Sahil Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Sham Lal (since deceased) through his LRs – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner-landlord's ownership and eviction claims. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. contentions regarding concealment and property ownership. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's reasoning on genuine need for premises. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. establishment of bona fide need by petitioner-landlord. (Para 13) |
| 5. final order to uphold eviction decision. (Para 14) |
Judgment
Mr. Harkesh Manuja, J.
The petitioner-landlord (Sahil Gupta), by instituting the present revision petition, seeks setting aside the order dated 18.05.2016 passed by the Appellate Authority, Sangrur (for short “Appellate Authority”), whereby an eviction order dated 17.08.2013 passed by learned Rent Controller, Sangrur (for short “Rent Controller”) was set aside, resulting into dismissal of his (petitioner) eviction petition.
FACTS:-
2. Briefly stating, the petitioner-landlord, who claims himself to be the owner of demised shop situated at Nabha Gate, Sangrur, after having purchased it vide sale deed dated 16.05.2003, filed an eviction petition against the respondent-tenant on the ground of arrears of rent as well as for his own personal bona fide necessity, while claiming himself to be neither owner nor occupier of an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
