SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1623

HARKESH MANUJA
Sahil Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Sham Lal (since deceased) through his LRs – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Arihant Jain, Mr. Arun Jindal, Mr. Kanish JIndal, Mr. Rakesh Gupta

Judgment

Mr. Harkesh Manuja, J.

The petitioner-landlord (Sahil Gupta), by instituting the present revision petition, seeks setting aside the order dated 18.05.2016 passed by the Appellate Authority, Sangrur (for short “Appellate Authority”), whereby an eviction order dated 17.08.2013 passed by learned Rent Controller, Sangrur (for short “Rent Controller”) was set aside, resulting into dismissal of his (petitioner) eviction petition.

FACTS:-

2. Briefly stating, the petitioner-landlord, who claims himself to be the owner of demised shop situated at Nabha Gate, Sangrur, after having purchased it vide sale deed dated 16.05.2003, filed an eviction petition against the respondent-tenant on the ground of arrears of rent as well as for his own personal bona fide necessity, while claiming himself to be neither owner nor occupier of any other vacant shop / premises situated within the urban area of Sangrur and also having not got vacated any other shop in the said area.

3. Upon notice, the respondent-tenant appeared and filed detailed written statement, contesting the claim made by the petitioner-landlord, while submitting that the petitioner-landlord owned and occupied other properties belon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top