Sunita vs State of Haryana - 2025 Supreme(P&H) 112

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(P&H) 112

HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Sunita – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Dev Kaushik Adv., Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj AAG, Haryana, Mr. Sankalp Gehlawat Adv., Mr. Rakesh Dhiman Adv.

Table of Content
1. revision petition against order allowing summoning of additional accused. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding the sufficiency of evidence to summon additional accused. (Para 4 , 5)
3. analysis of the applicability of section 319 cr.p.c. and evidentiary standards. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. conclusion setting aside the order to summon additional accused. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT :

Mr. Harpreet Singh Brar, J.

1. Present revision petition has been preferred against the impugned judgment dated 13.01.2020 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jhajjar, whereby the order passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jhajjar has been dismissed and the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning the petitioners as additional accused has been allowed.

2. Brief facts of the present case are that on 09.10.2016 at about 04 O’Clock, an altercation took place between the complainant and petitioners along with co-accused. Due to which, on the same day at about 9:45 PM, all the three accused came to the complainant with a Jeli, lathi and stone and tried to kill the complainant. Hence, the FIR (supra) was registered.

3. In consequence of the FIR (supra) and after completion