Sukhpal @ Rana vs State Of Haryana - 2025 Supreme(P&H) 359

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(P&H) 359

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Sukhpal @ Rana – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Mohit, Advocate
For the Respondent: Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana

Table of Content
1. the application for summoning additional accused was based on alleged specific involvement that lacked credible evidence. (Para 1 , 2)
2. the court emphasized the necessity of credible evidence for summoning under section 319 cr.p.c. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. final ruling upheld dismissal of the application due to absence of merit. (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT :

Harpreet Singh Brar, J. (Oral)

1. Present revision petition has been preferred against impugned order dated 05.04.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Charkhi Dadri, vide which the application filed by the petitioner-complainant seeking summoning of respondents No.2 & 3 as additional accused under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') [now Section 358 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS')\ to face the trial in FIR No. 106 dated 23.05.2020 under Sections 148, 149, 307, 323, 325, 341, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC'), registered at Police Station Jhojhu Kalan, has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the petitioner has levelled specific allegations against respondents No.2 & 3 in hi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document