SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 31

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Ankush – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Ajay Vijarania Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Manjari Nehru Kaul, J.

The present revision petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 16.11.2024, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar, whereby an application under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. filed by the complainant/prosecution seeking summoning of private respondents namely Saroj, Parmila, Monika, Aman, Sumit, Ankit, Ravi and Gaurav, as additional accused to face trial along with already challaned accused, has been dismissed in case FIR No.452 dated 04.08.2022 under Sections 148 , 149, 216, 302, 365, 364, 120-B of the IPC, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Hisar. The petitioner contends that the impugned order is perverse and contrary to the settled legal principles governing the summoning of additional accused under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C.

2. Before proceeding further, it would be apposite to discuss the scope and legal principles governing Section 319 of the Cr.P.C./358 of the BNSS . Section 358 of the BNSS empowers the learned Trial Court to summon a person not originally named as an accused if, during the course of trial, evidence emerges indicating his/their complicity in the offence. However, this power is discretionary and ex

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top