IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Harpreet Singh Brar, J.
Vijay Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab - Respondent
CRM No. 844 of 2025, CRA-S No. 4055 of 2024
Decided On : 15-02-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal provisions for the release of seized vehicles. (Para 1) |
| 2. seizures under the ndps act and cr.p.c. provisions (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. state's opposition based on applicant's conviction (Para 5) |
| 4. judicial notice on vehicle custody from superior judgments (Para 6 , 8) |
| 5. confiscation processes and hearing requirements in ndps act (Para 7 , 10 , 15) |
| 6. confiscation cannot occur before trial completion (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 7. procedural safeguards in the context of harsher penalties (Para 14 , 18) |
| 8. requirements for procedural fairness in confiscation. (Para 16) |
| 9. order of confiscation declared illegal and unsustainable (Para 19) |
JUDGMENT :
Harpreet Singh Brar, J.
1. Present application has been filed under Section 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘NDPS Act’), Section 498 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) read with Section 528 of BNSS for staying the confiscation of car bearing registration No. HR-25C-9870, Swift, white shade, which has already been released on superdari by learned trial Court.
FACTUAL MATRIX AND CONTENTIONS
2. Learned senior counsel for the applicant-appellant contends, inter alia, that in light of Section 51 of the NDPS Act, provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’) (now BNSS) shall apply to the seizure of any article or vehicle, provided they are not repugnant to the provisions of NDPS Act. It is argued that while the NDPS Act imposes a specific bar on the release of a seized vehicle, provisions of Sections 451 , 452, and 457 of Cr.P.C. are not inconsistent with the NDPS Act. Therefore, in view of the enabling provision contained in Section 51 of NDPS Act, these provisions must be applied to all cases of seizure and confiscation. Section 51 of NDPS Act reads as follows:
3. Further, Sections 451 & 452 of Cr.P.C., which are relevant for the adjudication of this application, read as follows: -
(i) When any property is produced before any Criminal Court during any inquiry or trial, the Court may make such order as it thinks fit for the proper custody of such property pending the conclusion of the inquiry or trial, and, if the property is subject to speedy and natural decay, or if it is otherwise expedient so to do, the Court may, after recording such evidence as it thinks necessary, order it to be sold or otherwise disposed of.
Explanation.--For the purposes of this section, “property” includes--
(a) property of any kind or document which is produced before the Court or which is in its custody;
(b) any property regarding which an offence appears to have been committed or which appears to have been used for the commission of any offence.
Section 452 - Order for disposal of property at conclusion of trial.
(1) When an inquiry or trial in any Criminal Court is concluded, the Court may make such order as it thinks fit for the disposal, by destruction, confiscation or delivery to any person claiming to be entitled to possession thereof or otherwise, of any property or document produced before it or in its custody, or regarding which any offence appears to have been committed, or which has been used for the commission of any offence.
(2) An order may be made under sub-section (1) for the delivery of any property to any person claiming to be entitled to the possession thereof, without any condition or on condition that he executes a bond, with or without securities, to the satisfaction of the Court, engaging to restore such property to the Court if the order made under sub-section (1) is modified
Bishwajit Dey Vs. State of Assam
Dharani Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Gurbinder Singh @ Shinder Vs. State of Punjab
Confiscation of vehicles under the NDPS Act must follow the prescribed procedural safeguards; failure to provide a hearing renders the order illegal.
The court ruled that a vehicle seized under the NDPS Act can be released on interim custody unless the owner is implicated in the unlawful use, affirming the application of Sections 451 and 457 of th....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the power to decide the claim of a person regarding a seized conveyance lies with the special court under Section 60 and 63 of the NDPS Act, a....
A registered owner of a vehicle seized in connection with a narcotics offence, who is not an accused, is entitled to interim custody of the vehicle, subject to meeting certain conditions to ensure co....
Confiscation and release of vehicle – Decision regarding confiscation of any article can be taken only by Special Court and only after conviction, acquittal or discharge – There is no provision for p....
The NDPS Act allows for the interim release of a seized vehicle unless the owner is implicated, provided due process is followed.
The Special Court under the NDPS Act can grant interim custody of seized vehicles, provided the owner proves non-involvement in the offence, despite potential confiscation.
The confiscation of a vehicle used in narcotics offenses under the N.D.P.S. Act can only occur post-trial conclusion, requiring the trial court to assess vehicle release applications on their merits.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.