SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 3235

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
MANJIVE SHUKLA
Baldhir – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ajay Kumar Tiwari, Sangam Lal Kesharwani

JUDGMENT :

MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.

1. Heard Sri Sangam Lal Kesharwani, learned counsel appearing for the revisionist and Sri Brijendra Pratap Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State.

2. The instant criminal revision has been filed challenging therein, the judgement and order dated 20.06.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge (N.D.P.S.)/Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 12, Saharanpur whereby, the application filed by the revisionist for release of his Innova Car, bearing Registration No. HR78-3205, had been rejected and the vehicle had been confiscated in favour of the State Government.

3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the revisionist is registered owner of Innova Car bearing Registration No. HR78-3205. The police recovered ten grams of smack from the aforesaid vehicle while the revisionist was moving in the said vehicle. The police had registered a criminal case as Case Crime No. 509 of 2021 under Section 8 /21 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985 in Police Station Gangoh, District Saharanpur. The Investigating Officer, after collecting evidence against the revisionist, had filed Charge- Sheet before the competent court in respect of the offenc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top