Back
SURESHWAR THAKUR, KIRTI SINGH
Arun Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Karnal Motors Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. land acquisition notifications and orders (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. determination of appeal maintainability and contempt jurisdiction. (Para 11) |
| 3. arguments against the maintainability of contempt proceedings. (Para 12) |
| 4. arguments regarding maintainability of contempt appeal (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. analysis of contempt proceedings and jurisdiction (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 6. conclusion quashing the impugned order (Para 45 , 46 , 47) |
JUDGMENT :
Sureshwar Thakur, J.
The instant appeal has been directed against the order dated 3.9.2024, as passed by the learned Contempt Bench of this Court in COCP No. 3034 of 2024.
Brief facts of the case.
2. A notification under Section 4 of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1894 (for short ‘the Act of 1894’) became issued on 24.3.1992, which became published, which became succeeded by a declaration made on 23.3.1993 under Section 6 of the Act of 1894. In pursuance thereto, an award was made on 29.12.2004 (Annexure P-7). The said notifications were made for acquiring the land for public purpose i.e. for the
Contempt proceedings cannot substitute for enforcement of binding court decisions; non-compliance must involve clear disregard of valid orders. The exercise of contempt jurisdiction is limited to ens....
Contempt jurisdiction must adhere to strict procedural norms and should not incorporate issues merits of the underlying dispute, as confirmed by established legal precedents.
The contempt jurisdiction is to ensure compliance with the order of the Writ Court and cannot be used to review or challenge the correctness of the order passed in compliance with the direction of th....
An appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act is maintainable only against orders imposing punishment for contempt; non-punitive orders are not appealable.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limitation on the appealability of a contempt Judge's order under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act and Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules....
An appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, is maintainable against any order in contempt proceedings, not just punitive orders.
The court clarified that in contempt proceedings, the judge's role is limited to assessing compliance with prior orders, not issuing new directives, emphasizing the maintainability of appeals under S....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
