Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ALKA SARIN
Dal Chand – Appellant
Versus
Rajender – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Alka Sarin, J. - The present regular second appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff-appellants challenging the concurrent findings returned by both the Courts concerned.
2. Brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the plaintiff-appellants herein filed a suit for damages and compensation on account of malicious prosecution alleged to have been launched by the defendant-respondents. It was averred in the plaint that one Jagbir was the brother of the plaintiff-appellant No.1 and uncle of the plaintiff-appellants No.2 to 4, who was a co-sharer in possession of 1/12th share in the total land measuring 355 Kanals 13 Marlas Bakadar 29 Kanals 13 Marlas situated within the revenue estate of Village Kithwari, Tehsil and District Palwal. The land of Jagbir was looked after by the plaintiff-appellant No.1 as Jagbir was of a weak mind and used to associate with Sadhus etc. The defendant respondents were aware of the weakness of Jagbir and with a malafide intention confined Jagbir on 31.05.2006. On 15.06.2006 all the defendant-respondents in furtherance of their common intention procured a sale deed of his share on payment of an ostensible sale consideration of Rs. 16,66,000.
In malicious prosecution claims, plaintiffs must prove malice and actual damages; failure to do so results in dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiffs must demonstrate malicious intent and material damages in malicious prosecution claims, with mere acquittal insufficient for recovery.
To establish malicious prosecution, a plaintiff must prove both a lack of reasonable cause and a favorable termination of the proceedings; mere acquittal does not suffice.
Acquittal in a criminal case does not automatically imply malicious prosecution; all elements of the claim must be established.
Malicious prosecution requires proving malice and lack of reasonable cause. The court established the appellants acted without sufficient basis, resulting in damages awarded for mental anguish.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
