Back
JASPREET SINGH
Arjun Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Ganesh Prasad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. suit for specific performance initiated. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. defendants contested execution and validity of the agreement. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. appellants argue plaintiffs failed to demonstrate readiness. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. counsel arguments rely on precedents. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 5. court considers essential ingredients for specific performance. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. key provisions of specific relief act discussed. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. court affirms readiness and willingness requirement. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. judicial discretion in specific performance cases emphasized. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 9. escalation of property prices not a sole basis for denial. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 10. court balances equities between parties. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 11. conditions for granting specific performance laid out. (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 12. court's discretion based on conduct and circumstances. (Para 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 13. final determination on suitability for specific performance. (Para 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 14. final order on payment adjusted with market conditions. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 15. order emphasizes compensation conditions. (Para 56 , 5 |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
