SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 448

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS BAHL
Ashwani Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Pawan Kumar (Since Deceased) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral)

1. Challenge in the present revision petition is to the judgment dated 14.07.2022 passed by the Rent Controller, Jalandhar vide which the eviction petition filed by the respondent under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the 1949 Act') as amended up to date, for the eviction of the present petitioner from the shop in question situated at Mohalla No.29, Jalandhar Cantt had been allowed. Challenge is also to the judgment and decree dated 22.10.2024 vide which the appeal filed by the present petitioner had been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has raised two grounds of challenge to the judgments passed by the Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Authority. First ground raised on behalf of the petitioner is to the effect that there is no relationship of landlord and tenant between the petitioner and respondent and once there was no relationship of landlord and tenant then the question of respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner from the premises in question does not arise. It is further submitted that the respondent-Pawan Kumar, who had appeared as PW1 had in his cross-e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top