SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1395

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS BAHL
Babu Ram (Since Deceased) Through His Legal Heirs – Appellant
Versus
Tilak Raj – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. G.C. Shahpuri, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Vikas Bahl, J.

Challenge in the present revision petition is to the judgment dated 23.02.2018, vide which the petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to be as 'Act of 1973'), filed by the respondent-landlord, has been allowed and the eviction of the present petitioner from the house in question has been ordered. Challenge is also to the judgment dated 31.08.2024 vide which the appeal filed by the petitioner through his legal representatives has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has challenged the impugned judgments by raising four submissions. The first ground of challenge is that at the time of filing of the petition i.e. on 22.04.2015, the respondent-landlord had stated that in the residence at House No. 160, Model Colony at Yamuna Nagar, where he is residing with his son, was to be exclusively used by his son and his daughter-in-law and son of the respondent-landlord was also maintaining his separate godown near the said house in Model Colony, Yamuna Nagar for his business. It is submitted stated that however during the course of cross-examination, the said respondent-landlord/Tilak

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top