SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 552

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
SUMEET GOEL
Kesar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mohit Commission Agent – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Himanshu Chhabra, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral)

1. The present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner impugning the order dated 18.12.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur, to the extent, that the execution of sentence and order appealed against has been suspended qua the petitioner (herein) subject to depositing of 20% of the amount of compensation. The relevant portion of the impugned order reads thus:

"Present: Shri G.S. Nandpuri, Advocate, counsel for appellant.

This appeal is received by way of entrustment. Heard. Since there are fairly arguable points involved in this appeal, as such, the same is admitted for hearing subject to all just exceptions. It be registered. Notice of the appeal be given to the respondent for 12.03.2025. Trial Court record be summoned for the said date.

Alongwith the appeal, an application for suspending the sentence of imprisonment and to release the appellant on bail till the disposal of the appeal, has also been filed. Appellant/accused was convicted by the learned trial court under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act vide Judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 19.11.2024 and he was sentenced to undergo impriso

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top