SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 565

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Saloni – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Sahil Choudhary, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Harpreet Singh Brar, J.

The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for quashing of orders dated 16.01.2025 (Annexure P-3) and dated 31.01.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by learned trial Court in FIR No.157 dated 12.06.2020 registered under Sections 420 and 406 IPC at Police Station Mullana, Ambala District Ambala, vide which bail order of the petitioner was cancelled and non-bailable warrants have been issued.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the petitioner was on regular bail and was regularly appearing before the learned trial Court, but due to some unavoidable circumstances, the petitioner could not appear before the learned trial Court on 16.01.2025 (Annexure P-3) and her bail order was cancelled and bail/surety bonds were forfeited to the State and non-bailable warrants have been issued against her and even thereafter, on 31.01.2025 (Annexure P-4), non-bailable warrants have been issued against the petitioner and notice to her surety was also issued.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the non-appearance of the petitioner was not deliberate and intentional and thus, aggrieved by the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top