PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Sandeep – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Harpreet Singh Brar, J.
CRM-5807-2025
Allowed as prayed for.
Testimonies of the prosecution witnesses are taken on record as Annexure P-9 subject to all just exceptions.
CRM-M-6801-2025
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No. 346 dated 19.06.2022 under Sections 323, 341, 302, 307, 379-B and 34 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act registered at Police Station Sadar Gohana, District Sonipat.
2. The FIR(supra) was lodged on the complaint of Vinod who stated that on 19.06.2020, at about 2.00 PM, he was ploughing his agricultural land with the help of his tractor, when Sandeep (petitioner herein), Deepak, Rajesh and accused Tilak Raj alias Tilka came there with tractor and stopped their tractor in front of the tractor of the complainant. Thereafter, they tried to run their tractor over the complainant with intention to kill him. The complainant saved his life by moving aside. Thereafter, all of them started beating him with Dandas and Lathis. When Shamsher, cousin of complainant, came there and tried to save the complainant from the
A delay in trial, especially for undertrial prisoners, infringes upon their rights under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Prolonged detention without trial violates Article 21 rights; co-accused receiving bail strengthens the case for bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.