SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 840

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
NIDHI GUPTA
Sudhama Devi – Appellant
Versus
Dd khosla tranport pvt. Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Nidhi Gupta, J. -

CM-25790-CII-2017

Prayer in this application filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act is for condonation of delay of 555 days in filing the accompanying appeal.

The only reason given by the applicant/appellant in the present application seeking condonation of extraordinary delay of 555 days is that "The appellant/applicant has no knowledge that an appeal can lie for the modification of award of the learned MACT. Therefore, it took her some time to contact her advocate and collect relevant papers to file this appeal. "

The same does not constitute sufficient reason for condoning the delay of 555 days in filing the appeal.

Hence, the present application stands dismissed.

FAO-7797-2017 (O&M)

The present appeal has been filed by the claimant No.2/ mother of the deceased, seeking enhancement of compensation of Rs.29,79,872/- awarded by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ludhiana (hereinafter referred to as "the learned Tribunal") vide Award dated 03.11.2015 passed in MACT Case No. 43 dated 04.01.2014 filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). The 2 claimants

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top