SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(P&H) 497

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NIDHI GUPTA
Gurnam Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Mandeep Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Gurnam Kaur Turka

JUDGMENT :

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

CM-26536-CII-2025

1. Prayer in this application under Order 41 Rule 19 CPC read with Section 151 CPC is for restoration of the main appeal which was dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 02.12.2025.

2. Heard.

3. In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the main appeal is ordered to be restored at its original number and position.

4. At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, the main appeal is taken up on Board today itself for disposal.

CM-6570-CII-2020

1. Prayer in this application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is for condonation of delay of 437 days in filing the accompanying appeal.

2. The only reason cited by learned counsel for the applicant/appellants in para 2 of the application seeking condonation of delay of 437 days is: “That the appellants had approached the counsel for filing the present appeal. However, they were not having complete case and were asked to bring complete record which took some time. The said delay is bonafide and unintentional.”

3. The said reason is vague and does not constitute sufficient cause to condone extraordinary delay of 437 days in filing the present appeal.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top