Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
RITU TAGORE
Mahender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Parkash – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ritu Tagore, J.
1. By this common order, above captioned revision petitions arising from the same order dated 31.01.2024 (Annexure P-1 in CR No. 1549 of 2024 and Annexure P-5 in CR No.3703 of 2024) passed in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 82 of 2023 and Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 88 of 2023, involving similar facts and issues, shall be disposed of Additionally, Civil Revision No. 1549 of 2024, challenging the order dated 14.07.2023 (Annexure P-10) shall also be disposed of along with this order.
2. For easy understanding, parties to the present revision petitions shall be referred to as per their original status before learned Trial Court and for the sake of reference, facts are being taken from CR No. 3703 of 2024.
3. The facts in brief are that Mahender Singh, petitioner/plaintiff instituted a Civil Suit (Annexure P-2) for rendition of account with consequential relief of permanent injunction against Pardhan Bhatha Company (defendant No.l), a brick kiln, through its proprietor Parkash; Parkash (defendant No.2) and Anil Kumar (defendant No.3), raising the averments that Parkash (defendant No.2) verbally gave the brick kiln on rent to him and Anil Kumar (defendant No.3)
The court can permit amendments to pleadings relating to subsequent events to facilitate justice, provided they do not introduce new causes of action or fundamentally alter the suit's nature.
Point of Law : An appeal against exercise of discretion is said to be an appeal on principle. The Appellate Court will not reassess the material and seek to reach a conclusion different from the one ....
Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 is “Sale” is a transfer of ownership in exchange for a price paid or promised or part-paid and part-promised.
The court upheld the plaintiff's need for the premises for building purposes, finding the notice to quit valid and the defendant's claim of manufacturing unproven.
The plaintiff has to establish substantial loss or injury being caused by the construction being undertaken/raised by co-sharer/co-owner, to tilt the balance of convenience in favor of the plaintiff ....
The courts ruled that discrepancies in agreements and the existence of a registered sale-deed established the defendants as rightful owners, negating the petitioner's claim for a temporary injunction....
Grant or refusal of interim relief/temporary injunction - Usually, prayer for grant of an interlocutory injunction is at a stage when the existence of legal right asserted by plaintiff and its allege....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
