PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
SUMEET GOEL, J.
Bhanu Partap Nayar – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRM-M-30554-2024
Decided on : 23-09-2024
JUDGMENT :
Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral)
1. Present petition has been filed under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0004 dated 28.05.2024, under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC registered at Police Station Women, District Bathinda.
2. The gravamen of the FIR in question relates to demand of dowry, harassment and cruelty being meted out to the complainant by her husband (petitioner-herein) and father-in-law, mother-in-law, maternal aunt of husband, brother-in-law, respectively. It has been alleged by the complainant that her marriage was solemnized with the petitioner on 13.04.2021. Sufficient dowry was given at the time of marriage including 20 lacs cash, gold kara, chain, ring etc. Despite this, complainant's in-laws continuously demanded more dowry, including a car and insulted the complainant for being from a poor family. The complainant has further alleged that the petitioner and his family members subject her to mental and physical harassment and continuously kept on pressurizing her to meet their dowry demands. They frequently insulted the complainant, stating that the dowry given was insufficient and humiliated her in front of others. Despite her best efforts to maintain peace in the matrimonial home, the demands of the accused for more dowry escalated and she was threatened with dire consequences if their demands were not fulfilled which caused her immense distress and fear for her safety. The complainant was physically and mentally abused, especially on 28.11.2021, when she was locked in a room and beaten up for not fulfilling the dowry demands. On 29.11.2021, the parents of the complainant were insulted when they visited her. It has also been alleged that the complainant's in-laws refused to allow the complainant to return to her matrimonial home after the birth of her daughter on 25.06.2022, expressing their dis-satisfaction over the birth of a girl child instead of a son. Multiple attempts were made by the parents of the complainant and relatives to reconcile the matter and rehabilitate the complainant but the same could not be fructified. The complainant's in-laws persisted in their demands for additional dowry. Furthermore, they misappropriated the istridhan of the complainant and continued to harass her both emotionally and physically. The complainant has requested that legal action against her husband, in-laws and other family members for their role in dowry harassment, physical abuse and desertion and hence an FIR ibid was got registered.
3. On 26.06.2024, the following order was passed:
"Apprehending his arrest in FIR No. 0004 dated 28.05.2024 registered for offences punishable under Sections 498-A,406 IPC at Police Station Women, District Bathinda; the petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail.
Inter alia contends that genesis of the FIR in question is the matrimonial discord between the petitioner and complainant-wife; petitioner is willing for an amicable settlement as well; & the petitioner is willing to join investigation and cooperate therein as also make endeavour to have the dowry articles recovered which are in his possession.
Notice of motion.
On asking of the Court, Mr. Adhiraj Singh, AAG, Punjab appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.
Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate has filed vakalatnama for the complainant. The same be taken on record.
Adjourned to 17.07.2024.
The petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 29.06.2024 at 11:00 A.M. in concerned Police Station and join investigation. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bond(s) to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. As and when further called by Investigating Officer, the petitioner shall join the investigation. He shall abide by the condition(s) enumerated under Section
The conduct of the accused is critical in determining anticipatory bail; misuse of interim protection can lead to denial of bail.
Mere non-recovery of disputed dowry articles and lack of requirement for further investigation can be considered in granting anticipatory bail in domestic violence cases.
Anticipatory bail may be denied in serious offences where allegations are grave and custodial interrogation is necessary for a fair investigation.
Anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. requires a careful assessment of the facts and circumstances, particularly in cases involving dowry allegations, where the safety of the complainant and th....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.