SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1770

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
SUMEET GOEL
Sukhwinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :M. N.S. Dhandiwal, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral)

1. Present revision petition has been filed against the judgment dated 02.01.2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Moga upholding the order dated 07.09.2017 passed by Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nihal Singh Wala, whereby respondent No.2 (herein) was acquitted from the charges under Sections 458 and 354 of IPC.

2. For the sake of brevity, convenience and to avoid any confusions the revisionist-petitioner, who was the original complainant informant in the FIR, will be referred to as 'complainant', and respondent No. 2, who was accused in the FIR, will be referred to as 'accused', respectively, in the present judgment.

3. Facts germane to the adjudication of the present revision petition are that FIR No.27 dated 23.03.2016 was registered against accused, resident of village Daudhar Garbi, District Moga under Sections 458 and 354 of IPC at Police Station Badhni Kalan. The trial of the said case was concluded by the Court of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Nihal Singh Wala, and vide its judgment 07.09.2017, the accused was acquitted from the charges levelled against him. Aggrieved, by the acquittal of the accused (respondent No.2 herein), the complai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top