SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 873

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Manvi – Appellant
Versus
Prateek Sawhney – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rahul Jaswal, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Vikram Aggarwal, J. (Oral)

1. The present revision petition has been preferred against order dated 25.08.2025 (Annexure P-4), passed by the Court of Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Panipat, vide which the application moved under Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, 'HMA') was dismissed.

2. The facts, as emanating from the revision petition, are that a petition under Section 13-B of HMA was instituted by the parties seeking divorce by way of mutual consent. Marriage between the parties was solemnized as per Hindu rites on 30.01.2025. After living together and the marriage having been consummated, temperamental differences arose between the parties. Under the circumstances, a petition under Section 13-B of HMA (Annexure P-2) was filed for grant of divorce by way of mutual consent. The petition was accompanied by an application under Section 14 of HMA, seeking permission to file the petition within one year of the marriage and to waive of the mandatory period of one year.

3. By way of impugned order dated 25.08.2025, the application under Section 14 of HMA was dismissed, leading to the filing of the present revision petition.

4. Learned counsel for th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top