SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 1102

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
G. RADHA RANI
Gaddam Navya – Appellant
Versus
All Concerned – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Nageshwar Rao Pujari

ORDER :

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioners aggrieved by the order dated 18.07.2024 passed in I.A. No.873 of 2024 in HMOP No.89 of 2024 by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Sanga Reddy.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that both the petitioners filed a petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short ‘HM Act’) for dissolution of their marriage by mutual consent and filed I.A. No.873 of 2024 under Section 13B (2) of the HM Act to waive off the cooling period of six months. But, the said application was dismissed by the trial court observing that no urgency was made out, six months mandatory period as prescribed under Section 13B (2) of the HM Act was not yet completed and no cogent reasons were brought on record. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners preferred this revision petition.

4. He further submitted that the marriage between the petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2 was solemnized on 04.06.2021 as per Hindu rites and customs at Suryadevara Gardens, Mallampet road, near Bachupally, Sanga Reddy. It was an arranged marriage and the marriage was consummated. After the marri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top