SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 942

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ALKA SARIN, J.
Sankeshiya Devi And Others – Appellant
Versus
Kulwinder Singh And Others – Respondent
FAO-3282-2021 (O&M)
Decided on : 08-05-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. Ekta Thakur, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Abhinav Singla, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)

1. Present appeal has been preferred by the claimant-appellants aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') vide award dated 25.02.2021 on account of death of Anhoti Yadav (hereinafter referred to as the 'deceased').

2. Since the facts, as recorded in the impugned award passed by the Tribunal, are not in dispute, the same are not being reproduced herein for the sake of brevity.

3. The Tribunal in the present case had awarded the following compensation :

Sr. No.

Heads

Compensation Awarded

1

Monthly income

Rs. 6,682/-

2

Annual income

[Rs. 6,682 x 12] = Rs. 80,184/-

3

Future prospects @ 40%

[Rs. 80,184 x 32073] = Rs. 1,12,257/-

4

Deduction - 1/4th

[Rs. 1,12,257 - 28,064] = Rs. 84,193/-

5

Multiplier -16

[Rs. 84,193 x 16] = Rs. 13,47,088/-

6

Loss of estate

Rs. 15,000/

7

Funeral expenses

Rs. 15,000/-

8

Loss of consortium @ ?40,000/- each

[Rs. 40,000 x 5] = Rs. 2,00,000/-

Total compensation

Rs. 15,77,088/-

Interest

7.5% per annum

4. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that before the Daily Lok Adalat, the Insurance Company had agreed that the deceased be treated as a skilled worker. Learned counsel for the claimant-appellants has contended that though the Tribunal has rightly applied a deduction of 1/4th, multiplier of 16 and future prospects @ 40%, however, the amounts awarded under the conventional heads as well as under the head 'loss of consortium' are not in accordance with the law. In support of his contentions, he has relied upon the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. [(2017) 16 SCC 680], Magma General Insurance Company Limited vs. Nanu Ram alias Chuhru Ram & Ors. [(2018) 18 SCC 130] and N. Jayasree & Ors. vs. Cholamandalam M.S General Insurance Company Ltd. [2021(4) RCR (Civil) 642].

5. Per contra learned counsel for respondent No.3-Insurance Company would contend that sufficient amount has already been awarded and there is no scope of any enhancement.

6. Heard.

7. In the present case, no appeal has been filed by respondent No.3-Insurance Company. Since there is no challenge to the deduction, multiplier and the addition towards loss of future prospects as assessed by the Tribunal, the same are accordingly maintained. The Insurance Company had agreed before the Lok Adalat that the deceased be treated as a skilled worker and hence, as observed in order dated 25.01.2023 passed by the Lok Adalat, the deceased is treated as a skilled worker. The minimum wages for a skilled worker prevailing at the relevant point of time were Rs. 9,854/- per month and hence, the income of the deceased is assessed as Rs. 9,854/- per month. The amounts awarded under the conventional heads as well as the under the 'loss of consortium' are also not in accordance with the law inasmuch as an amount of Rs. 30,000/- has been awarded towards loss of estate and funeral expenses and .2,00,000/- under the head 'loss of consortium' and hence, as per the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Pranay Sethi (supra), Magma General Insurance Company Limited (supra) and N. Jayasree (supra), the claimant-appellants would be entitled to Rs. 18,000/- (Rs.15,000+20% increase) towards loss of estate and Rs.18,000/- (Rs.15,000+20% increase) towards funeral expenses. The claimant-appellants would also be entitled to Rs.48,000/- each (Rs.40,000+20% increase) towards loss of consortium.

8. Accordingly, the reworked compensation is as under :

Sr. No.

Heads

Compensation Awarded

1

Monthly Income

Rs. 9,854/

2

Annual Income

Rs. 1,18,248/- [Rs. 9,854 x 12]

3

Deduction - 1/4th

Rs. 88,686/- [Rs. 118248 - 29562]

4

Future Prospects - 40%

Rs. 1,24,161/- [Rs. 88686 + 35475]

5

Multiplier - 16

Rs. 19,86,576/- [Rs. 124161 x 16]

6

Loss of estate

Rs. 18,000/-

7

Funeral expenses

Rs. 18,000/-

8

Loss of consortium

(i) Parental [Rs. 48,000/- x 2]

(ii) Filial [Rs. 48,000/- x 2]

(iii) Spousal's

Rs. 96,000/-

Rs. 96,000/-

Rs. 48,000/-

(Tota

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top