SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1063

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS BAHL
Malook Singh Bahia – Appellant
Versus
Ravinder Kaur Bahia – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral)

1. This is a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the impugned order dated 08.01.2019 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr.Div.)-1, Jalandhar, vide which the petitioner had been directed to affix the ad-valorem court fee.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the present case, the petitioner has challenged the registered sale deed dated 16.03.2012 executed by defendant no.2, as attorney of the present petitioner-plaintiff in favour of defendant no.1, who is sister of defendant no.2 and daughter-in-law of the present petitioner-plaintiff. It is submitted that defendant no.1 by misrepresenting facts and stating to the plaintiff that only for the purpose of management of the properties of the plaintiff a special power of attorney dated 17.02.2012 be executed in favour of defendant no.2, but actually got executed the power of attorney in which the right to transfer etc. was also given. It is submitted that since the special power of attorney had been taken from the present petitioner by misrepresenting facts and the subsequent sale deed was executed on the basis of the said special power of att

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top