Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Bindra Bidani – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish Chander – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Virinder Aggarwal, J.
The appellants/defendants, being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree dated 16.04.1991 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ferozepur, in Civil Appeal No. 10 of 22.02.1989/07.01.1991, whereby the well-reasoned judgment and decree dated 19.01.1989 of the learned Sub-Judge 1st Class, Fazilka, in Case No. 172-1 of 02.08.1984, were erroneously set aside, respectfully invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 41 of the Punjab Courts Act, 1918, by way of the present Regular Second Appeal (RSA). The appellants seek restoration of the decree passed by the learned Trial Court and appropriate relief for the substantial injustice suffered.
1.1. It is respectfully submitted that the impugned judgment and decree is vitiated by patent illegality, perversity, and grave errors of law, compounded by a mis-appreciation of evidence on record, resulting in a manifest miscarriage of justice. In these circumstances, the appellants pray that this Court be pleased to set aside the impugned judgment and decree and restore the lawful and well-reasoned decree passed by the learned Trial Court.
2. For clarity and ease of reference, the part
Second appeals in Punjab are treated under Section 41 of the Punjab Courts Act, 1918, limiting the scope of judicial review to legal infirmities without framing substantial questions of law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
