Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Gurcharan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mukhtiar Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Virinder Aggarwal, J.
The appellants/defendants, being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree dated 25.04.2000 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Mansa, in Civil Appeal No. 195 of 24.10.1996, whereby the well-reasoned judgment and decree dated 03.09.1996 rendered by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Civil Suit No. 13 dated 04.01.1994 were erroneously reversed, most respectfully invoke the appellate and supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Section 41 of the Punjab Courts Act, 1918, by way of the present Regular Second Appeal ('RSA'). The appellants humbly seek restoration of the lawful decree passed by the learned Trial Court and appropriate relief for the substantial injustice occasioned to them by the impugned judgment.
1.1 It is respectfully submitted that the impugned judgment and decree suffer from patent illegality, perversity, and misdirection in law, being founded upon a fundamentally erroneous appreciation of evidence and misapplication of settled legal principles, thereby resulting in a grave miscarriage of justice. In these circumstances, the appellants earnestly pray that this Court be pleased to set aside the imp
A sale deed executed without notice to co-sharers is invalid if no completed partition exists, as established under the Punjab Land Revenue Act.
Jurisdiction of civil courts extends to rectification of erroneous revenue entries reflecting ownership contrary to established decrees.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
