JUDGMENT :

VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J.

1. Aggrieved by the reversal of the well-reasoned judgment and decree of the learned Trial Court dated 25.02.1999 by the learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, vide the impugned judgment dated 23.10.2000, the Appellant-Defendant begs to prefer this Regular Second Appeal (“RSA” for short). It is respectfully submitted that the learned First Appellate Court exceeded its jurisdiction by over-setting findings of fact based on a flawed evidentiary appreciation, thereby occasioning a failure of justice. The Appellant, therefore, seeks the intervention of this Court to set aside the impugned judgment and decree, and to restore the decree dated 25.02.1999, ensuring the lawful resolution of the dispute.

2. The material facts and the sequence of events leading to the present appeal are succinctly summarized as follows:-

“The case of the plaintiffs is that defendant No.1, Ishar Kaur, was the owner of several parcels of land comprising khata Nos. 251/281, 252/282, and 609/677, as detailed in the plaint. Ishar Kaur sold portions of the suit land to Gurdev Singh, predecessor-in-interest of the plaintiffs, vide registered sale deed dated 01.12.1986 (Ex.P1), and