PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
SURESHWAR THAKUR AND VIKAS SURI, JJ.
Puneet Sharma And Others – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory, Chandigarh And Others – Respondent
CWP No. 26405 of 2024 (O&M)
Decided on : 25-02-2025
JUDGMENT :
Sureshwar Thakur, J.
1. Through the instant writ petition, the petitioners seek the quashing of the agenda item No. 4/resolution, as declared in 32th meeting of the Town Vending Committee, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh held on 6.7.2023 (Annexure P-4), show-cause notice (Annexure P-5), and, of the public notices (Annexures P-3 and P-7).
Brief facts of the case
2. It is averred in the instant petition, that the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 (for short the Act 0/2014'} came into force on 1.5.2014. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation, thereafter notified Union Territory of Chandigarh Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending), Rules 2015 (for short 'the Rules of 2015'').
3. On 30.3.2016, the U.T., Administrator under Rule 12 of the Rules of 2015, thus constituted the Town Vending Committee and notified the same on 30.3.2016. Subsequently, the Town Vending Committee held its meeting on 6.4.2016. The Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh, conducted a survey in the year 2016, throughout U.T., Chandigarh, and, after the said survey, the Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh, registered the surveyed street vendors. Resultantly, the petitioners were also surveyed, and, became registered by the Municipal Corporation, and, were also given the survey IDs by the Municipal Corporation, as per the provisions of the Act of 2014. It is further averred that after the issuance of the survey IDs, the respondent No. 4 issued a provisional certificate for their vending sites situated at Sector-19, Chandigarh, and, permission became granted to the petitioners to work in Sector-19.
4. It is further averred in the instant petition, that subsequently respondent No. 2 arbitrarily dislocated the petitioners from their place of vending i.e. Sector-19, and, consequently respectively shifted petitioners No. 1 to 7, 9 and 10 to Sector-15, petitioner No. 8 to Sector-23 and petitioner No. 11 to Sector 46. On account of the said shiftings, the petitioners on account of non-availability of customers rather could not earn their livelihood. The petitioners also submitted representation/application with regard to their said relocation/dislocation, however, the respondents did not consider their representation/application. The petitioners again approached respondent No. 2 seeking permission to work as street vendors in Sector-19, however, no action was taken by the respondent concerned on the said raised plea by the petitioners. It is further averred thereins, that respondent No. 3- Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh, issued a public notice (Annexure P-3) in the local newspaper stating therein, that the Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh, is going to conduct draw of lots to allot the sites to the vendors concerned, who have not been allotted any site till date, and, requested them to thus clear their dues upto 28.2.2024, and, therebys also provided a last opportunity to all the defaulting vendors to deposit the outstanding dues of licence fee, so that, their names can be considered for the draw of lots.
5. The Town Vending Committee in its meeting held on 6.7.2023 (Annexure P-4), delegated its powers to the Additional Commissioner/Joint Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh, to decide the matter(s) with respect to cancelling of the apposite licences but in accordance with the procedure established by law. Thereafter the Joint Commissioner issued show cause notices (Annexure P-5) to the petitioners/street vendors under Section 10 of the Act of 2014, thus directing them to deposit the outstanding dues on account of vending fee and penalty. The petitioners moved an application dated 20.2.2024 (Annexure P-6) to respondent No. 3 to not illegally, and, forcibly recover the monthly charges from them.
6. It is further averred that another public notice (Annexure P-7) became issued, thus informing all the registered street vendors, that therebys a last
The court affirmed that street vendors do not have an unqualified right to occupy designated no-vending zones and that proper procedures for eviction as per the relevant statutes were followed.
The election notification for the Town Vending Committee was invalid due to failure to publish in the Official Gazette, violating statutory requirements.
The court's decision was based on the provisions of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act 2014 and related regulations.
Compliance with statutory notice requirements and proper issuance of street vending certificates were upheld, confirming lawful methodological procedures for vendor relocations under the Street Vendi....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to direct the Town Vending Committee to consider the petitioner's case during the survey in accordance with the relevant l....
Street vendors cannot be evicted without adherence to statutory provisions, including the completion of surveys and designation of vending zones as mandated by the Street Vendors Act.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to issue a writ of mandamus and the application of the provisions of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regu....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.