SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3120

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
L.Victoria Gowri, J.
Muthu Raja and ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The District Collector and ors. - Respondents
W.P.(MD)Nos.20338, 27088 and 29854 of 2024 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.17251, 17252, 23000, 23001, 23002, 24886, 25158 and 26384 of 2024
Decided On : 07-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.R.Vigneshwaran
For the Respondent:Mr.S.Kameshwaran Government Advocate, Mr.R.Baskaran, Senior Counsel For M/s.R.B.Law Associates

The election notification for the Town Vending Committee was invalid due to failure to publish in the Official Gazette, violating statutory requirements.

Headnote:(A) The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 - Sections 2(1) and 38(1) - Tamil Nadu Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood, Regulation of Street Vending and Licensing) Rules, 2015 - Rule 12 and 13 - Writ petitions concerning the election of Town Vending Committee members without proper notification and finalized street vendor list - The respondents failed to publish the election notification in the Official Gazette as mandated, rendering the election process void. (Paras 26 and 27)

(B) Legal sustainability of election notification - The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to statutory requirements for conducting elections, highlighting the importance of official publication in the District Gazette. (Paras 23 and 24)

(C) Rights of Street Vendors - The Act ensures the protection and regulation of street vending activities, recognizing them as essential for urban livelihoods. (Para 18)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, street vendors in Tiruchirappalli, challenged the election notification for the Town Vending Committee, arguing that it was issued without a finalized list of street vendors and not published in the Official Gazette as required by law.

Findings of Court:
The court found the election notification invalid due to non-compliance with statutory requirements, directing the respondents to issue a fresh notification following the law.

Issues: The main issue was whether the election notification was legally sustainable given the failure to adhere to publication requirements.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the failure to publish the election notification in the Official Gazette rendered the election process void, emphasizing the necessity of following statutory procedures.

Result: Writ Petitions allowed.

ORDER :

L.Victoria Gowri, J.

The prayer in W.P.(MD)No.20338 of 2024 reads as follows:-

“Writ Petition is filed, to direct the respondents to finalize the list of Street Vendors in Tiruchirappalli Corporation Limits and to conduct an election for forming a “Town Vending Committee”, as per the provisions of ' The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 ' and ' Tamil Nadu Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood, Regulation of Street Vending and Licensing) Rules, 2015 ' in consonance with the order dated 24.10.2018 passed in WP (MD) Nos.10452 and 10503 of 2009, 9877 of 2011, 7326 of 2012, 18676, 19244, 19258, 21090 and 21104 of 2014 and 10060, 10061 and 14348 of 2015 by this Court, by considering the representation of the petitioner's dated 19.08.2024.”

2.The prayer in W.P.(MD)No.27088 of 2024 reads as follows:-

“Writ Petition is filed, calling for the records of the 3rd respondent by the impugned Election Notice in Na.Ka. No. Nil dated 04.11.2024, quash the same and direct the 3rd respondent to prepare and publish the voter list of the street vendors having avocation within its territorial jurisdiction, deleting the dead persons, removing the persons who dont fall within the definition of the street vendor under Section 2(1) of the said Act, issue identity cards to the said persons and issue the final voter list for holding elections.”

3.The prayer in W.P.(MD)No.29854 of 2024 reads as follows:-

“Writ Petition is filed, directing the 2nd respondent to consider the representation dated 27.11.2024 and direct the 3rd respondent to publish the draft and final voter list as per Rule 13 (5) of the Tamil Nadu State Vendor (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of street Vending Scheme and Rules), 2015, to hold election to elect the representatives to the street vending committee”

4.The writ petitioners in W.P.(MD)No.20338 of 2024 are Street Vendors stationed at 11th Cross, Thillai Nagar Streets/cut roads, Trichy, who are engaged in street vending business of selling fruits and fresh juices to the public at large. The petitioner in other two Writ Petitions are one and the same and he is also a Street Vendor, selling readymade clothes at NSV road, 13th ward, Srirangam zone, Trichy.

5.The writ petitioners in W.P.(MD)No.20338 of 2024 are Street Vendors, who possess street vendors' identity card as issued by the second respondent. The identity card contains specific details as to the name, type of business, duration of vending business and address of the street vendor. However, from 06.08.2024, on several occasions, the respondent authorities interfered with the peaceful conduct of business of the writ petitioners, by directing them to close their business immediately. Hence, the writ petitioners caused a legal notice on 13.08.2024, calling upon the second respondent not to forbear them from continuing their business as Street Vendors, since the validity of the Street Vendor's identity card subsists till 2027. Even after receiving the said notice and acknowledging the same, the third respondent along with his officers came to the petitioners vending spot and ordered to shut down the vending business on 16.08.2024. Thereafter, the second petitioner gave a representation to the respondents on 19.08.2024 and issued a legal notice as well on 20.08.2024, requesting the respondents to prepare the list of Street Vendors and to conduct election for the purpose of constituting the Town Vending Committee and to implement the earlier order passed by this Court in Anaithu Tharaikadai Vyaparigal Padukappu Sangam Theppakulam, Trichy & Ors. v. the District Collector, Trichy & Others in W.P.(MD)Nos.10452 and 10503 of 2009 batch dated 24.10.2018, for the purpose of safeguarding the right of street vending. The said representation was also received and acknowledged by the respondents. However, the representation of the petitioners was not considered and hence, the Writ Petition came to be filed.

6.While being so, the third

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top