Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Ravinder Singh @ Ravi – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Harpreet Singh Brar, J. (Oral)
1. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.195 dated 23.10.2022 under Section 25/54/59 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Dinanagar, District Gurdaspur.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the petitioner was granted bail by learned trial Court and he was regularly appearing, however, due to noting a wrong date i.e. 08.01.2025, instead of 07.01.2025, he could not appear before learned trial Court. It is further contended that vide order dated 07.01.2025, learned trial Court, while cancelling bail of the petitioner, ordered to forfeit his bail bonds to the State and warrants of arrest were issued against him. Thereafter, the petitioner approached learned Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur seeking anticipatory bail, but the same was dismissed vide order dated 14.02.2025 (Annexure P-2). Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has filed the present petition.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the absence of the petitioner is neither willful nor deliberate and he undertakes to appear before
The paramount consideration of the court was to secure the presence of the accused and expedite court proceedings, leading to the grant of anticipatory bail with conditions.
The importance of the accused's presence during trial for speedy conclusion and the use of cash security to ensure the accused's appearance.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
