Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR
Dipesh Jain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. non-intentional absence from court cannot justify bail cancellation. (Para 1 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner sought exemptions based on reasonable grounds. (Para 4) |
| 3. the court emphasizes the procedural rights in bail matters. (Para 6) |
| 4. final order to allow bail subject to conditions and appearance. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT :
YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR , J.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS , 2023 for quashing of order dated 08.08.2025 (Annexure P-6) passed by Court of Ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bathinda whereby bail of the petitioner has been cancelled and bail bonds have been forfeited and non bailable warrants have been issued in case arising out of FIR No.98 dated 03.11.2016 under Section 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC registered at Police Station Cantt Batinda, on account of his absence.
2. Notice of motion. Mr. G.S. Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the material on the file.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner was released on bail in the present case and petitione
The cancellation of bail requires justifiable grounds, and mere absence from proceedings does not suffice for punitive measures.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
