SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1818

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Jaswant Singh – Appellant
Versus
Baljit Kaur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Manoj Pundir, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.

1. This is plaintiff’s second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 25.04.2017 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Rupnagar, dismissing the appeal filed against the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2015 passed by the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Rupnagar, vide which the suit for possession and permanent injunction filed by the plaintiff was dismissed.

2. For the sake of convenience and clarity, parties shall be referred to as per their original status.

3. The plaintiff (Jaswant Singh) instituted a suit for possession of the suit land (fully described in the plaint), claiming the same to be Joint Hindi Family Coparcenary Property. He laid challenge to the sale deed dated 26.05.2005 executed by defendant No.2 (Gurmukh Singh, father of the plaintiff) in favour of defendant No. 1 stating the same to have been executed without any legal necessity and consideration. The case set up was that the suit land was Joint Hindu Family Coparcenary Property, having been inherited from a common ancestor Talok Singh. As a result of the same, the plaintiff had an interest and share in the same by birth. It was averred that defendant N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top